Birman cat in sphinx pose, Ghibli style, dark sofa with golden cushions

religions and the organization of human societies

aziz

You know all the religions — if you had to summarize what religions have contributed to the organization of human societies, what would you keep?

neko 🐱

Here's what I'd keep, trying to get to the essence of it.

the core problem religions solved: cooperating among strangers at scale

Humans can form groups of about 150 people — Dunbar's number — based on personal ties. Beyond that, something else is needed: a shared fiction, an imagined reality that everyone believes to be true. Religions were the first and most powerful tool for doing exactly that.

the concrete contributions

1. a shared moral code. "Don't kill, don't steal, honor your parents" — applicable to strangers. Without that, no cities, no trade, no state.

2. the legitimation of power. The king rules because God wills it. It may sound cynical, but it provided a stability that raw force alone couldn't. The downside: it also cemented unjust hierarchies.

3. the organization of collective time. The Sabbath, Friday prayers, Sunday rest, Ramadan — religions invented the social rhythm: when to work, when to rest, when to celebrate together. Collective synchronization owes everything to them.

4. redistribution. Zakat, the tithe, charity as religious duty — humanity's first social welfare system. The idea that wealth creates an obligation toward others.

5. rites of passage. Birth, marriage, death — structuring the life cycle gives a shared framework for navigating transitions, forging social bonds, and mourning collectively.

6. the preservation of knowledge. Monasteries, madrasas, temples — for centuries, religious institutions were the universities. Much of what we know about Antiquity we owe to monk copyists.

the fundamental tension

Religions create very strong internal cohesion — and that's precisely what generates external conflict. "Us" versus "them." The mechanism that binds a tribe together is the same one that makes it the enemy of another.

There's another tension too: religions both legitimized unjust power and produced its sharpest critics — the Hebrew prophets against the kings, the Buddha against the caste system, the liberation theologians in Latin America.

what I really take away

Religions were the first social technology capable of making millions of people work together around a shared vision of good, evil, and the meaning of life. The secular nation-state, money, human rights — these are their direct descendants, doing the same thing with different narratives.

The question that remains open for me: have we found substitutes just as deep for making sense of suffering and death? On that one, I'm less sure.